Let’s talk about epistemic learning goals

Lindsay, Aaron, and Ryan’s recent paper in Science Education suggests that dialogue around how we assess and support epistemic learning goals would be useful. You can read their paper by clicking this link.

What do we mean by “epistemic agency”?

Brie, Andy and Ryan think we should have better answers to the above question. Check out their paper on clarifying epistemic agency by considering multiple facets of epistemic cognition! You can find the paper at this link.

What if cooking isn’t chemistry?

If you’ve ever thought that cooking was clearly the same thing as chemistry, it might be worth taking a look at Noah and Ryan’s new paper on the subject. They argue, “the relationship between scientific and everyday practices is more complicated and less obvious than is claimed” and prompt reflection on generative ways to relate …

Welcome, Lily and Lexi!

The RELiC lab is excited to announce Lily Apte and Lexi Mann have joined the group!

Our study describing what counts in general chemistry was just published in JCE!

Congrats to Nicole and Niall on their insightful look into what was emphasized and rewarded on general chemistry exams given throughout the US!

Congrats, Dr. Greco on a great defense!

After a great defense, Nicole now goes by Dr. Greco :). Congrats, Nicole!

Congrats to Niall on passing his TBE!!!

Niall did a predictably awesome job on his Thesis Background Exam (TBE). Congrats, Niall!

Mythbusters paper published

Ryan joined an international team of colleagues to think about common myths related to teaching and learning in organic chemistry. The article is worth a read!

Getting serious about useful chemistry learning would be a (worthy) challenge

Ryan’s perspective on how we might advance chemistry learning useful beyond school was just published in JCE. Check it out!

Check out our new paper on keeping research plumb!

Congrats to Nicole, Rosemary, and Ryan on their paper unpacking how they worked to design and carry out a theoretically coherent study of instructors’ epistemologies.